Council Meeting Minutes will be posted after they are approved at the following meeting.
JOINT MEETING:
Somerset Borough Council & Municipal Authority of the Borough of Somerset
July 7th, 2025 - 5:00 p.m.
JOINT MEETING AGENDA
1. Joint Meeting Called to Order:
a) Borough Council Meeting Called to Order – President Ream
b) Municipal Authority Meeting Called to Order – Chairman Flower
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call:
a) Borough Council Members present: Pam Ream; Lee Hoffman; Sue Opp; Steve Shaulis;
Ian Mandichak and Mario Dirienzo.
b) Borough Council Member absent: Ruby Miller.
c) Mayor: Fred Rosemeyer also present.
d) Also present were the following: Borough Manager, Michele Enos; Municipal Authority Manager, Jessica Sizemore; Director of Finance, Brett Peters; Administrative Assistant, Roger Bailey; Solicitors, James Cascio & William Barbin: Consulting Engineers Tom Reilly & Jake Bolby.
Roll Call:
a) Municipal Authority Members present: Ben Flower; Jeff Shaffer and Lee Hoffman.
b) Municipal Authority Member absent: Ruby Miller.
Public Attendance:
a) Susan Woy, Harvey Frankel, Brandon Duriez, Helen Hawkey, Skeets Ellis, Glenn Miller, Jr., Steve Peck, Barbara Lynch, Douglas Gardner, Judy Ellich, Andy Ellich, Alec Bittner and Eric Martin.
4. General Public Comments:
a) Brandon Duriez, Vice-President of Snyder Environmental Services -
Mr. Duriez spoke in behalf of Snyder Environmental Services in regards to the Borough’s upcoming Sewer Project. He mentioned that the company submitted a bid for the Borough’s Sewer Project.
Mr. Duriez highlighted the company’s history, work history and operations of Snyder Environmental Services. He mentioned that they specialize in projects like the sewer project. Mr. Duriez mentioned that the bid package EADS Group put together included different methodologies from lining, pipe bursting, lateral lining and slip lining. He added that Snyder Environmental Services does it all in-house.
Mr. Duriez petitioned for the Authority and Council to award the Sewer Project to Snyder Environmental Services.
b) Dr. Skeets Ellis (Retired Dentist of 40 years) –
Dr. Ellis spoke in behalf of not removing fluoride from the Borough’s water system. He explained the benefits of why systemic fluoride in the water system is the most effective tool that we have for cavity prevention, with no close second. He said that fluoridation is backed by over 100 leading professional organizations. It is estimated that ending fluoridation could result in 25 million decayed teeth in the next 5 years in the U.S., with the greatest effect on low-income and uninsured families.
Dr. Ellis requested that the Authority reconsider their vote and keep the water fluoridated. He expressed to follow and listen to the science, and not all the misinformation that is being spread around. Dr. Ellis noted that it is a very important health decision.
c) Dr. Harvey Frankel (Retired Pediatric Dentist - Practiced in Somerset for 38 years) –
Dr. Frankel also spoke in behalf of not removing fluoride from the Borough’s water system.
He also explained the benefits of having fluoride in the water system, and the detriment to oral health if it is removed, especially in children.
Dr. Frankel rhetorically asked where the plans originated to remove the fluoride from the water system and where it got its momentum. Fluoridation has shown to be a very effective, and low cost method, to prevent dental cavities for over 75 years.
Dr. Frankel requested the Authority to please rescind their action to remove the fluoride from the water system, or otherwise adjust the concentration of fluoride in the water to zero, and then continue to adjust the level of fluoride to the optimal concentration of .7%.
d) Helen Hawkey with PA Coalition for Oral Health –
Ms. Hawkey spoke in behalf of the PA Coalition for Oral Health about keeping the fluoride in the water system. She stated that she wanted to make sure that the Borough’s rate payers in the community have a say in the decisions that the Authority is making because it is really important.
Ms. Hawkey mentioned that the PA Coalition for Oral Health has worked with multiple communities across the entire state of Pennsylvania about these things, and works closely with the State Department of Health and the State Department of Environmental Protection. She also mentioned the multiple water systems that the PA Coalition for Oral Health have worked with in the past 4-6 years that have had questions about water fluoridation.
Ms. Hawkey noted that the PA Coalition of Oral Health offers grants to communities for water fluoridation equipment, so costs should not be an issue. She also mentioned awards from the ADA and CDC to water systems that consistently fluoridate. Resources are also offered to address concerns that the Authority may have.
Ms. Hawkey noted that the amount of fluoride added to the water system, at appropriate levels, is safe and has been tested.
Ms. Hawkey mentioned how low-income and uninsured residents will suffer the most because of poor dental health if fluoride is removed. She also mentioned the shortage of dentists in Pennsylvania, and the resulting long wait times for dental appointments.
Ms. Hawkey requested that the Authority rescind their decision to stop the fluoridation program, and to continue to keep doing what they have been doing for many, many years.
e) Dr. Eric Martin (Dentist) -
Dr. Martin also encouraged keeping the fluoride in the Borough water system, and the benefits derived from it for the patients in preventing tooth decay.
As the provider, he expressed that there are so many patients that have a difficult time getting prompt dental appointments, and he is unsure of who is going to be able to do the extra work on patients if there is more tooth decay, because there is a shortage of dentists in this area.
Dr. Martin expressed that the dentists speaking today really want to help people, and they think the right thing to do is to keep the water fluorinated.
Mrs. Ream said that in regards to this discussion, there has only been discussion amongst the Authority and Council. No decision or action has been made at this point. The only action voted on was a motion for discussion to be held.
Solicitor Barbin stated that what initiated the discussion was the expense that was needed to replace equipment at the Water Treatment Plant, due to the corrosion of pipes and pumps from adding fluoride.
f) Emily Korns (Borough Resident) –
Ms. Korns also spoke up in favor of keeping fluoride in the water system.
Mrs. Ream noted that discussion amongst the two Boards is always held when it is going to incur new cost to the Borough for water or anything they do.
Mrs. Ream reiterated that no decision has been made. She voiced her appreciation to all in attendance who came to give their comments and information to help the Authority have a better understanding so they can make an informed decision.
Solicitor Barbin noted that the final decision will be made by the Municipal Authority, and if they decide that fluoride will be removed from the water system, a formal Public Hearing will be announced.
5. New Business – Joint Discussions:
a) Executive Session – Matters of Potential Litigation.
Motion
Mrs. Opp moved, seconded by Mr. Dirienzo to go into Executive Session to discuss matters of potential litigation.
Motion Unanimously Carried
5:30 p.m.
Back in Session
5:50 p.m.
b) PennVEST Update – Phase 1 – Sewer Project.
Mr. Bolby reviewed the bids and bid results for the Sanitary Sewer Improvements Project-Phase 1A in the areas of Brierwood and West Somerset. The total budget for the project provided by PennVEST for construction is $17.3 million dollars, which will be the budget that is available to the Authority to make the award for the Construction Contracts. All bids were within budget.
The bids were opened and read aloud on June 23, 2025 in the Municipal Building. The bid proposals included a base bids, 3 additive alternates and 5 material alternates. Mr. Bolby summarized the details of the work involved and the bid proposals.
Mr. Bolby expressed that EADS recommended for the Authority to consider all the options because there are unique advantages and disadvantages to each. He said to also seek legal advice. After selection the Authority should seek PennVEST approval before they make their formal decision.
6. Council Meeting Business
a) Move directly into Council Meeting Agenda.
BOROUGH COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
1. Meeting Called to Order – President Ream
2. Pledge of Allegiance: - (Done at the Joint Meeting of Borough Council and the Municipal Authority)
3. Roll Call:
a) Borough Council Members present: Pam Ream; Lee Hoffman; Sue Opp; Steve Shaulis; Ian Mandichak and Mario Dirienzo.
b) Borough Council Member absent: Ruby Miller.
c) Mayor: Fred Rosemeyer also present.
d) Also present were the following: Borough Manager, Michele Enos; Municipal Authority Manager, Jessica Sizemore; Director of Finance, Brett Peters; Administrative Assistant, Roger Bailey; Solicitor, James Cascio; Consulting Engineers Tom Reilly & Jake Bolby.
Public Attendance:
a) None
4. Approval of Agenda:Consider approving the agenda as presented.
Motion:
Mr. Mandichak moved, Mrs. Opp seconded, to approve the agenda as presented.
Motion Unanimously Carried
5. Announcements:
a) None
6. Approval of Minutes of Previous Meeting(s):
a) May 19th, 2025 – Borough Council Meeting Minutes.
Motion:
Mr. Shaulis moved, Mr. Hoffman seconded, to approve the May 19th, 2025 Borough Council Meeting Minutes.
Motion Unanimously Carried
7. Award of Bids:
a) None
8. General Public Comments:
a) None Requested
9. Administrative Business:
a) Communications (None)
b) Payment of Bills for the month of June 2025.
Motion:
Mrs. Opp moved, Mr. Dirienzo seconded, to approve the payment of bills for the month of June 2025 numbered 43342 – 43516 totaling $853,437.91.
Motion Unanimously Carried
c) Department Reports – Consider approving the Departmental Reports for the month of May 2025.
Motion:
Mrs. Opp moved, Mr. Mandichak seconded, to approve the Departmental Reports for the month of May 2025.
Motion Unanimously Carried
10. Policy Agenda:
Old Business:
a) None
New Business:
a) Pension Ordinance – Consider authorizing the Ordinance for instituting the drop program for Non-Uniform employees under contract negotiations.
Ms. Enos explained that this is for the ASFME Contract that was negotiated. Part of that was the Pension Ordinance that had to be created for the Drop Program which has to be adopted by Council.
Motion:
Mrs. Opp moved, Mr. Dirienzo seconded, to authorize the Ordinance for instituting the drop program for Non-Uniform employees under contract negotiations.
Motion Unanimously Carried
ORDINANCE NO: 1391
BOROUGH OF SOMERSET, SOMERSET COUNTY
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE # 947
THE BOROUGH OF SOMERSET PENSION PLAN
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Ordinance is to amend a certain portion of the Borough of Somerset Non-Uniformed Pension Plan, as heretofore enacted, amended, and revised; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the Borough of Somerset wishes to establish a DROP PROGRAM for its eligible members of the Non-Uniformed Pension Plan under the terms of this Ordinance,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby enacted and ordained as follows:
DEFINITIONS
ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION
As a condition to Participation in the DROP, the DROP Participant shall provide any other information reasonably required by the Borough.
DROP BENEFITS
The form of payment selected by the DROP Participant or surviving Beneficiary shall comply with the minimum distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
DROP DEATH BENEFITS
ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
When a retired Employee is re-employed as a DROP Participant, the Employee’s monthly Normal Retirement Benefit and supplemental amounts provided to a Participant after retirement as cost-of-living increases and interest on that benefit shall be credited to the DROP Participant account under Section 7, interest shall be compounded and credited monthly at a fixed annual rate of 3.5%. When a DROP Participant terminates employment with the Borough as a DROP Participant, the Participant’s total accumulated benefits shall be calculated, charged to the DROP Participant account, and paid out of the Pension Trust Fund under Section 8.
The balance in the DROP Participant account shall be excluded from actuarial valuation reports of the retirement Plan prepared and filed under Act 205. The DROP Participant account shall be held in trust for the exclusive benefit of DROP retired Participants who are or were DROP Participants or the beneficiaries of these Participants or an alternate payee pursuant to Section 8.
DULY ENACTED AND ORDAINED this ___7th___ day of ___July__, ___2025, by the Borough Council of the Borough of Somerset, in public session.
b) Deputy Tax Collector – Consider ratifying the selection of Ms. Jane Miller as the Deputy Tax Collector for Somerset Borough.
Motion:
Mr. Mandichak moved, Mrs. Opp seconded, to ratify the selection of Ms. Jane Miller as the Deputy Tax Collector for Somerset Borough.
Motion Unanimously Carried
c) Proclamation – Presented by Mayor Rosemeyer to celebrate the Rotary’s 100th Anniversary.
Proclamation
100th Anniversary of the Rotary Club of Somerset
WHEREAS, the ROTARY CLUB OF SOMERSET was duly formed from it’s distinguished, and visionary beginnings on January 30th 1925, with the principle of “service above self” and with God’s grace has richly served the Somerset community for 100 years and…
WHEREAS, 2025 marks the 100th Anniversary of this fraternal organization working together to make our community a better place to live through programs of service from local to international and …
WHEREAS, the first Community Service Project undertaken back in 1925 by the Rotary Club of Somerset was working with the Crippled Children Clinic in conjunction with the Easter Seals Society…and
WHEREAS, that Community Service has continued through the years with supporting such projects and organizations as the Children Aid Home; Boys and Girls Club; Rotary Radio Days; Hospice Golf Tournament; Salvation Army; Somerset Hospital Foundation; Students of the Month; Humane Society; the Next Step Center; the Somerset County Library; and other projects locally as well as working with the World Health Organization and Rotary Clubs throughout the world to eradicate Polio; and with children’s health projects in Haiti, the Dominican Republic and Brazil, and…
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council of the Borough of Somerset wish to honor and congratulate the Rotary Club of Somerset on this special occasion…
NOW THEREFORE, I, Pamela L. Ream; President of Somerset of Somerset Borough Council; and Fredric Rosemeyer, Mayor the Borough of Somerset, along with the other members of Somerset Borough Council, do hereby proclaim June 23rd 2025 to be Rotary Club of Somerset 100th Anniversary Day in the Borough of Somerset in recognition of their continuing service to our community, and furthermore extend our sincerest wishes for continued success.
Signed this 23rd day of June, 2025
d) Somerset County 911 – Acknowledgement of the letter received from 911 concerning procedures for dispatching EMS services.
Ms. Enos explained that the Borough received a letter from County Control. It stated that with their staffing crisis, they are going to discontinue automatic dispatching for EMS and certain types of fire calls. If it is not necessary, they will not be going out on the first alarms but will be called in. She added that the Borough has been helping out the Borough’s Fire Department by going to certain calls and not dispatching the Fire Department unless needed. This will be working the same way with EMS now as well. 911 won’t just automatically be dispatching them.
e) Ordinance – Consider adopting this Ordinance to incur and guarantee debt in connection with the Municipal Authority’s Stormwater System and Sanitary Sewer System Improvements Project. ($7,975,079.00)
Ms. Enos explained that Somerset Borough is required to back this loan of the Municipal Authority, who owns the infrastructure, because the Borough has real estate enabling taxes that back this loan and guarantee this loan. This Ordinance states this fact as part of the PennVEST required documents. Borough Council will be ensuring the $7,975,079.00 for the project.
Motion:
Mr. Hoffman moved, Mr. Mandichak seconded, to adopt an Ordinance to incur and guarantee debt in connection with the Municipal Authority’s Stormwater System and Sanitary Sewer System Improvements Project. ($7,975,079.00)
Motion Unanimously Carried
BOROUGH OF SOMERSET
SOMERSET COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
ORDINANCE NO. _1392_
OF THE COUNCIL MEMBERS OF THIS BOROUGH DETERMINING TO INCUR LEASE
RENTAL DEBT, EVIDENCED BY THE GUARANTEED REVENUE BONDS IN THE
MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $7,975,079.00, TO BE AUTHORIZED AND
ISSUED BY THE MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OF THE BOROUGH OF SOMERSET IN
CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION AND IMPROVEMENTS
TO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER AND STORMWATER FACILITIES IN AND
ABOUT SOMERSET BOROUGH, AND PAYING RELATED COSTS, FEES AND
EXPENSES; SPECIFYING THE REALISTIC USEFUL LIFE OF THE PROJECT;
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING APPROPRIATE OFFICERS OF THE BOROUGH TO
TAKE CERTAIN ACTIONS AND TO EXECUTE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING
A GUARANTY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BOROUGH, AS GUARANTOR AND THE
MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OF THE BOROUGH OF SOMERSET, AND THE
PENNSYLVANIA INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT AUTHORITY; APPROVING THE
FORM, MAXIMUM GUARANTEED AMOUNTS AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT OF THE
GUARANTY AGREEMENT, AND PLEDGING THE FULL FAITH, CREDIT, AND
TAXING POWER OF SOMERSET BOROUGH IN SUPPORT THEREOF; CREATING A
SINKING FUND IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH GUARANTY OBLIGATIONS AND
APPOINTING A SINKING FUND DEPOSITORY; AND PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL
OF ALL INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES.
WHEREAS, the Borough of Somerset, Somerset County, Pennsylvania (the “Local
Government Unit”) is the local government unit under provisions of 53 PA.C.S. Chs. 80-8, as
amended and supplemented from time to time, known as the Pennsylvania Local Government Unit
Debt Act, (the “Act”); and
WHEREAS, the Municipal Authority of the Borough of Somerset, (the “Authority”) is a
municipality authority organized by appropriate action of the Borough of Somerset and existing
under the Municipal Authorities Act, 53 Pa. C.S. Ch. 56 (the “Authorities Act”); and
WHEREAS, the Authority will undertake a capital project which consists of constructing
alterations, additions and improvements to the sanitary sewer and stormwater system facilities in and
about this Somerset Borough, (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority (“PENNVEST”) has
approved funding for the Project, subject to the approval of lease rental debt proceedings under the
Act; and
WHEREAS, provided the debt related to the project qualifies as self-liquidating, as
aforesaid, the proposed increase of lease rental debt, together with the Local Governmental Unit’s
other indebtedness presently outstanding, will not cause the limitations of the Local Governmental
Unit’s lease rental debt incurring power, pursuant to constitutional and statutory authority, to be
exceeded.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the
Somerset Borough, Somerset County, Pennsylvania, and it is hereby ordained and enacted by the
authority of same as follows:
SECTION 1. This Borough of Somerset authorizes and requests the Municipal Authority of
the Borough of Somerset (the “Authority”) to undertake and complete the Project.
SECTION 2. This Borough determines to incur debt as such term is defined in the Act,
which shall be lease rental debt of this Borough pursuant to the Act, in connection with the Project.
SECTION 3. Such lease rental debt shall be in the maximum principal amount of
$7,975,079.00 and shall be evidenced by the Borough guaranty of a certain obligation issued by the
Authority under the Authorities Act consisting of a guaranteed revenue note in the maximum
principal amount of $7,975,079.00, to be issued by the Authority under the Authorities Act (the
“PENNVEST Note”). The PENNVEST Note shall have the benefit of and be secured by, among
other things, the guaranty obligations of the Borough.
SECTION 4. The Borough specifies that the estimated useful life of the Project is at
least 30 years.
SECTION 5. Under the PENNVEST Note, the Authority shall begin principal amortization
of the PENNVEST Note on the earlier of: (i) three (3) months after the estimated date of completion
of the Project, (ii) the first day of the calendar month following actual completion of the Project, or
(iii) three (3) years from the date of settlement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, principal
amortization on the PENNVEST Note shall not be deferred beyond the later of two (2) years from
the date of settlement or one (1) year after completion of the Project in accordance with Section
8142(c) of the Act. As of the date of this Ordinance, the projected estimated date of completion of
the Project is December 2026.
SECTION 6. The Borough, as guarantor, shall enter into two Guaranty Agreements, to be
dated as provided therein (the “Guaranty Agreement”), substantially in the form approved and
presented to this meeting and attached hereto as EXHIBIT A-1 and A-2, with the Pennsylvania
Infrastructure Investment Authority (PENNVEST) as security for the PENNVEST Note. The
Guaranty Agreement shall set forth the terms and conditions to be observed by the Borough relative
to the PENNVEST Note and to guaranty unconditionally, for the benefit of PENNVEST and other
holder, from time to time of the PENNVEST Note, full prompt payment of Debt Service, as such
phrase is defined in the Guaranty Agreement, to the extent provided therein, as such shall become
due and payable under the PENNVEST Note for the life of the PENNVEST Note.
SECTION 7. A copy of the Guaranty Agreement, in the form so presented and approved at
this meeting shall be filed with the Secretary of this Borough and shall be available for inspection at
reasonable times by interested person(s) requesting such inspection.
SECTION 8. This Borough in the Guaranty Agreement does hereby covenant with
PENNVEST and the Authority as follows: (i) to include the Debt Service, as in respect of its
guaranty for each of its Fiscal Years in which such sums shall be payable, in its budget for that
Fiscal Year; (ii) to appropriate such amounts from its general revenues for payment of its obligations
under the Guaranty Agreement; (iii)to duly and punctually pay or caused to be paid from its sinking
funds (hereinafter mentioned and identified) or any other of its revenues or funds, the amount
payable in respect to the guaranty, at the dates and times required there under according to the true
meaning and intent thereof; and (iv) for such budgeting, appropriation, and payment in respect to the
guaranty, this Borough shall, and does pledge irrevocably, its full faith, credit, and taxing power.
This covenant shall be specifically enforceable. For purposes of complying with the forgoing
covenant, this Borough covenants that it shall budget the amounts set forth in EXHIBITS B-1 and
B-2 which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, such amounts being such debt service on the
PENNVEST Note for the Fiscal Years in such amounts are payable, and shall appropriate and pay
over to PENNVEST such amounts subject to the provisions of the Guaranty Agreement regarding
the same.
This Borough also shall covenant in the Guaranty Agreement and does hereby covenant that,
to the extent sufficient money shall not be available in its then current budget at any time when
payments are required under the Guaranty Agreement, and if it shall be unable to incur debt lawfully
in the current year for the purpose or to issue tax anticipation notes or other to satisfy its obligations
the Guaranty Agreement, it shall include any monies so payable by it in its budget for the next
succeeding Fiscal Year and shall appropriate such amounts to the payment of such obligations and
shall duly and punctually pay such obligations in the manner stated in the Guaranty Agreement,
according to the true intent and meaning thereof and, for such budgeting, appropriation and payment,
it shall and does pledge, irrevocably, its full faith, credit, and taxing power. This covenant shall be
specifically, enforceable.
It shall be the intent and purpose of the Guaranty Agreement that this Borough shall be
required to pay over to PENNVEST only that portion of such debt service that cannot be paid from
other funds available for that purpose, as set forth in the Guaranty Agreement.
SECTION 9. The maximum guaranty obligations of the Borough, with respect to the
PENNVEST Bond, as set forth in the Guaranty Agreement, shall be payable, if and as necessary, in
such amounts as set forth in EXHIBITS B-1 and B-2.
SECTION 10. The guaranty obligation of this Borough shall be payable from the tax and
other general revenues of the Borough.
SECTION 11. This Borough hereby creates and establishes a sinking fund as such phrase is
defined or applied by the Act, with respect to its obligations under the Guaranty Agreement with
respect to such guaranty, and Somerset Trust Company is hereby designated as the sinking fund
depository and paying agent as such phrases are defined by the Act, with respect to obligations of
this Borough under the Guaranty Agreement with respect to such guaranty.
SECTION 12. The President or Vice President and the Secretary of the Borough Council,
as appropriate, are authorized and directed to prepare, certify and file with the Pennsylvania
Department of Community and Economic Development the debt statement, as such phrase is defined
in the Act required by 53 Pa. C.S. Section 8110, on behalf of this Borough, and the borrowing base
certificate appended to such debt statement.
SECTION 13. The President or Vice President and the Secretary of the Borough Council, as
appropriate, are authorized and directed to prepare statements required by the Act to qualify the lease rental debt for exclusion from the appropriate debt limit as self liquidating.
SECTION 14. The President or Vice President and the Secretary of the Borough Council, as
appropriate, are authorized and directed to make application to the Depart of Community and
Economic Development for approval with respect to the Guaranty Agreement as required by 53 P.S.
Section 8111(b), and in connection with this application to pay or cause to be paid the applicable
filing fee.
SECTION 15. After obtaining the approval discussed in Section 13, the President or Vice
President and the Secretary of the Borough Council, as appropriate, are authorized and directed to
execute, attest, and deliver the Guaranty Agreement to PENNVEST.
SECTION 16. President or Vice President and the Secretary of the Borough Council, as
appropriate, are authorized and directed to execute all documents and to do all other acts as may be
necessary and proper to carry out the intent and purpose of this Ordinance and the undertakings of
the Borough, under the Guaranty Agreement.
SECTION 17. In the event any provision, section, sentence or clause or part of the
Ordinance shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not impair or affect any remaining provision,
section, sentence, clause or part of the Ordinance from remaining in full force and effect. This
Ordinance shall become effective in accordance with the provisions of the Act.
SECTION 18. All ordinances or parts of ordinances that are inconsistent herewith are
repealed.
ORDAINED AND ENACTED THIS 7th day of July, 2025.
Borough of Somerset
Somerset County, Pennsylvania
f) Management Agreement – Consider approving the 2nd Amendment to the Management Agreement between the Borough of Somerset and the Municipal Authority of the Borough of Somerset.
Ms. Enos stated that ever since the Borough transferred the stormwater facilities to the Municipal Authority, who in turn created a rate structure, there has been a current existing Management Agreement in place.
This 2nd Amendment to the Management Agreement adds that the Municipal Authority is handling these responsibilities, but the Borough is managing the overall system for the Municipal Authority.
Motion:
Mrs. Opp moved, Mr. Dirienzo seconded, to approve the 2nd Amendment to the Management Agreement between the Borough of Somerset and the Municipal Authority of the Borough of
Somerset.
Motion Unanimously Carried
Committee, Administration, Special Reports
g) Borough Manager’s Report – Given by Michele Enos.
Ms. Enos had nothing further to report.
h) Finance Report – Given by Brett Peters.
Mr. Peters viewed the Finance Report Summary for May 2025 with Borough Council on the digital screen in the Council room. He added that June’s Financial Report can be viewed from the Borough’s website.
General Fund: Water Fund: Sewer Fund: Storm sewer Fund:
Revenues – 66.77% Revenues – 38.80% Revenues – 39.18% Revenues – 10.52%
Expenses – 38.87% Expenses – 36.49% Expenses – 35.61% Expenses - 0.09%
i) Municipal Authority Manager’s Report – Given by Jess Sizemore.
Mrs. Sizemore had nothing further to report.
j) President’s Report – Given by Pam Ream
Mrs. Ream had nothing further to report.
k) Somerset Inc. Representative – Given by Lee Hoffman.
Mr. Hoffman noted that there are 21 professional artists coming to Somerset Borough for “Chalk the Block” this year starting on Friday, July 25 - 27, 2025.
l) PSAB Representative – Given by Fred Rosemeyer.
Mayor Rosemeyer said that the PSAB Conference was held in Hershey, PA the first week of June with over 412 people in attendance. He mentioned that he was elected as President of the Pennsylvania Mayor’s Association for the whole state. He will be in that position for the next 4 years.
Also, the County Borough’s Association was held in Meyersdale on June 26th with 11 Borough’s attending.
m) Fire Department Representative – Given by Steve Shaulis.
Mr. Shaulis said that as of July 1st, 2025, between the 2 fire departments, there were 503 fire calls.
Glow Bingo is coming up this Friday night, and has become a tremendous fund raiser.
Mr. Shaulis also mentioned that the Fire Department recently provided sprinklers for the playground children during the heatwave.
n) Engineer’s Report – Given by Jake Bolby.
Mr. Bolby discussed the following updates to the Engineer’s Report:
WATER:
1) Water System Capital Improvement Projects:
Mr. Bolby said that there are still a few items on Contracts 2 & 3 for the Water Project that should be wrapped up shortly, then they will be working with PennVEST to finish up the funding end.
SEWER:
1) Assessment, Repair, and Abatement Plan (Hydraulic Overload):
Mr. Bolby noted that outside of the bid opening, Phase 1B, 1C, & 1D are moving forward. Depending on DEP’s review and approval, 1B could go into PennVEST as early as July 30, 2025 which is the next funding cut-off date.
Mr. Bolby mentioned that the Wastewater Treatment Plant received their Draft NPDES renewal.
GENERAL:
2) Center Ave. Sidewalk:
Mr. Bolby said we are still in the warranty period, but the repair work is still in discussion with the contractor.
o) Mayor’s Report – (Rosemeyer)
Mayor Rosemeyer said that the Police Department had an anniversary. The department had its start in 1852, 173 years ago.
July 19th is the Drug Free Community if anyone wishes to attend.
Last week the Fire & Police Departments had the “Cone with a Cop” in the park with many children in attendance.
In August of 2026 the “25/250 Salute” will be held in honor of the Fire Department and our country.
The brand new Police vehicle is completely out of service needing a new engine, but is under warranty.
Mayor Rosemeyer thanked the Chief of Police and Officer Borosky for keeping the overtime hours low by being willing to work shifts to make sure the shifts are covered.
“Somerset Night Out” is on Tuesday, August 5th. Mayor Rosemeyer encouraged Council Members to also attend.
11. Executive Session - Personnel.
(Executive Session previously held at the Joint Meeting of the Authority and Borough Council)
12. ADJOURNMENT
Motion:
Mrs. Opp moved to adjourn, seconded by Mr. Dirienzo.
Motion Unanimously Carried
6:55 p.m.
________________________________________
Michele A. Enos, Borough Manager/ Secretary